From the iSport Cricket Paddock: Ardent KKR fan and iSporter Hirok Banerjee is not a happy man. Read his post-match analysis of the MI vs KKR match here.

When a lot of things go into thinking about simple things, then basics are compromised and things get unnecessarily complicated. The innings of the Knight Riders resembled that of a ship which knew where it wanted to go but lost its way – with a captain who seems to have no idea how to read a compass.
The game of T20 is one which requires being constantly aggressive at one end while ensuring that hara-kiri is not committed on the other. This is not a game for solid, steady, sedate batting. This is not a game for puritans. This is a game where a defensive mindset almost invariably will ensure defeat. Ganguly’s emphasis on keeping wickets intact for the first half of the innings does have merit. But the underlying assumption on that would be that the team scores at a brisk pace during the middle overs finally leading to an insurmountable assault in the slog overs. Unfortunately, the fear of losing crucial batsmen has bogged down Ganguly so much that Chris Gayle played an innings which appeared to have been played by his shadow. Maybe, he left his ‘mongoose’ at Jamaica.
The Knights made two interesting changes which defied all logic and thought. They dropped Hodge and Tiwary and got in Mandeep Singh and Harpreet Singh. In a team, where there is a dearth of stroke-players, the exclusion of Tiwary is surprising, considering only him having shown some sort of ability to hit. With a start of 42 without loss after 6 overs, the expectation would be that someone would cut loose. Instead we were subjected to another round of absolutely torrid batting where fulltosses were hit straight to fielders and no innovation was seen in the batting.
The less said about the Riders’ bowling, the better. While Mumbai showed how to come up with yorkers and slower deliveries repeatedly, the Knights bowled short and wide and deserved every bit of the treatment meted out by Tendulkar and Co. It is time that Ishant Sharma understood that fast bowling is as much about brains as about brawns. Strangely, the bowling coach of KKR has been one of the best exponents of the art of fast bowling in world cricket. Maybe, Ganguly can place a request to Modi to allow Wasim to take the field in place of Ishant. The result would assuredly be many times better!
155 were never enough from the beginning. It needed two blitzy innings. And that was what happened. Tendulkar, possibly in the form of his life, ensured that Mumbai came within striking distance from where it would just be a matter of sensible batting. Sachin paced his innings to perfection. He slapped out Ishant whenever it was pitched short, which was about all the time, and one straight drive in the second over and three front-foot pulls thereafter showed why he is considered one of the greatest ever to stand with a willow in his hand.
There was a time in the middle overs when Kartik and Mathews squeezed Mumbai and Kartik did have the chance of turning the match when the score read 70 for 1. He dropped the match – a simple caught and bowled of Sachin. With 80 still required off the last 10 overs, it could have gone down the wire.
KKR is more or less out of the reckoning for a semi-final berth, if ever they had a chance. It’s a shame, that India’s most successful captain finally has fallen prey to the very thing he taught his team to denounce – the fear of defeat. Adios Sourav! IPL was never meant to be for you.
The game of T20 is one which requires being constantly aggressive at one end while ensuring that hara-kiri is not committed on the other. This is not a game for solid, steady, sedate batting. This is not a game for puritans. This is a game where a defensive mindset almost invariably will ensure defeat. Ganguly’s emphasis on keeping wickets intact for the first half of the innings does have merit. But the underlying assumption on that would be that the team scores at a brisk pace during the middle overs finally leading to an insurmountable assault in the slog overs. Unfortunately, the fear of losing crucial batsmen has bogged down Ganguly so much that Chris Gayle played an innings which appeared to have been played by his shadow. Maybe, he left his ‘mongoose’ at Jamaica.
The Knights made two interesting changes which defied all logic and thought. They dropped Hodge and Tiwary and got in Mandeep Singh and Harpreet Singh. In a team, where there is a dearth of stroke-players, the exclusion of Tiwary is surprising, considering only him having shown some sort of ability to hit. With a start of 42 without loss after 6 overs, the expectation would be that someone would cut loose. Instead we were subjected to another round of absolutely torrid batting where fulltosses were hit straight to fielders and no innovation was seen in the batting.
The less said about the Riders’ bowling, the better. While Mumbai showed how to come up with yorkers and slower deliveries repeatedly, the Knights bowled short and wide and deserved every bit of the treatment meted out by Tendulkar and Co. It is time that Ishant Sharma understood that fast bowling is as much about brains as about brawns. Strangely, the bowling coach of KKR has been one of the best exponents of the art of fast bowling in world cricket. Maybe, Ganguly can place a request to Modi to allow Wasim to take the field in place of Ishant. The result would assuredly be many times better!
155 were never enough from the beginning. It needed two blitzy innings. And that was what happened. Tendulkar, possibly in the form of his life, ensured that Mumbai came within striking distance from where it would just be a matter of sensible batting. Sachin paced his innings to perfection. He slapped out Ishant whenever it was pitched short, which was about all the time, and one straight drive in the second over and three front-foot pulls thereafter showed why he is considered one of the greatest ever to stand with a willow in his hand.
There was a time in the middle overs when Kartik and Mathews squeezed Mumbai and Kartik did have the chance of turning the match when the score read 70 for 1. He dropped the match – a simple caught and bowled of Sachin. With 80 still required off the last 10 overs, it could have gone down the wire.
KKR is more or less out of the reckoning for a semi-final berth, if ever they had a chance. It’s a shame, that India’s most successful captain finally has fallen prey to the very thing he taught his team to denounce – the fear of defeat. Adios Sourav! IPL was never meant to be for you.
Set as favorite
Comments (4)

a guest
said:
|
... Seeing Ganguly fumble these days will make anybody wonder whether he was ever a good captain or was it just sheer luck and Dravid. Playing untested youngsters is fine and adds some x factor to an otherwise predictable and dull side, but so far in 3 versions of IPL, good youngsters have performed only when they were given opportunity at the top and told to attack. Not at no. 5 or 6. Even Tiwari flourished while opening. I doubt how much of a gamechanger can a mandeep/harpreet be if they come in at no 5/6. Ganguly can only be accomodated at no. 4 or 5 in this format. One more thing of note in this IPL has been the success of good players from ICL like jhunjhunwala, rayudu, satish etc. KKR roped in the best allrounder from ICL, ganapati vignesh, and doesnt even play him. The only progress I have seen Ganguli make from IPl 1 to 3 is getting out of love with a certain mr. Agarkar. That may just not be enough. |
|
a guest
said:
|
... Seeing Ganguly fumble these days will make anybody wonder whether he was ever a good captain or was it just sheer luck and Dravid. Playing untested youngsters is fine and adds some x factor to an otherwise predictable and dull side, but so far in 3 versions of IPL, good youngsters have performed only when they were given opportunity at the top and told to attack. Not at no. 5 or 6. Even Tiwari flourished while opening. I doubt how much of a gamechanger can a mandeep/harpreet be if they come in at no 5/6. Ganguly can only be accomodated at no. 4 or 5 in this format. One more thing of note in this IPL has been the success of good players from ICL like jhunjhunwala, rayudu, satish etc. KKR roped in the best allrounder from ICL, ganapati vignesh, and doesnt even play him. The only progress I have seen Ganguli make from IPl 1 to 3 is getting out of love with a certain mr. Agarkar. That may just not be enough. |
|
a guest
said:
|
... @Guest: Could not agree more with you. Thankfully, so far we have not seen Agarkar in action. Ganguly was never a great thinker. He was instinctive and inspirational and he had the fire. Sadly enough, in IPL III, those attributes seem to be missing. |
|
a guest
said:
|
... I hope you have mentioned this as Saurav's swansung too early like the countless people who have done so earlier...just wanna repeat that many of them have been made to eat humble pie...just wait till the end of the tournament and then make your signature judgement....KKR got rid of Ishant and that solved half of the problems...Saurav is still one of the best in KKR and the games KKR have won have been driven by his astute captaincy...lets wait n watch |
|
Write comment
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|












