Cricket Update from the iSport Cricket Paddock: The Indian Cricket team has produced legends over time. Few great batsmen, a few phenomenal bowlers. But, at present are we selecting players who do a bit of both? iSporter Hirok Banerjee questions the current fad Ravindra Jadeja in the team.

Indian cricket has always been besotted with bowlers who can bat and batsmen who can bowl. The latest obsession to this party is Ravindra Jadeja. There was a point in time when the search for an all-rounder was so demanding that India experimented and tried its level best to stick the tag to the likes of Vijay Bharadwaj, Reetinder Sodhi, Sunil Joshi, Hrishikesh Kanetkar and Rohan Gavaskar. (They all did win matches for India but faded into oblivion before you could say ‘cricket’)
At that time, Ganguly, Rahul and Sachin were the mainstay and Yuvraj and Sehwag were yet not at their prolific best. Dhoni had not arrived. Which implied that our batting was not quite solid. So we needed a batsman. On the bowling front, Harbhajan was in wilderness, Nehra intermittently injured and inconsistent and Ajit Agarkar at his usual expensive self. There was only Zaheer and Anil to bank on. So we needed a bowler. Hence what better if you get someone who can do a bit of both?
10 years hence with the advent of Irfan, Yusuf, Gautam, Sehwag, Dhoni and the likes you would have thought that we are past that age. Yet, our selectors and our captain continue to befuddle us reposing faith in Ravindra Jadeja. Jadeja, in his current avatar is exactly what we do not need. We can boast of a pretty strong batting line-up now, even though in Sachin's absence, we still appear a bit wobbly and a formidable bowling line-up as well. So why go for a mixed-bag when there are options to choose a specialist bowler or a batsman as the situation demands?
It is also not that Ravindra is a phenomenal performer. Picture this – Ravindra’s batting average is 35.5 which is not enviable by any stretch of imagination and out of that, if one were to look at his performance against the big teams, namely Australia and South Africa his average is a measly 23 and 29 respectively. The strike-rate is good but nothing to wax eloquence about. Hence, he does not merit a place purely on his batting talent.
Having a sneak peek on his bowling performance one is inclined to conclude that as a fifth bowler he is way too good but since when have we started playing with five regular bowlers? And even if we do, why not allow Pragyan Ojha or Amit Mishra to have a shot for a regular place. Both of them have shown sufficient talent to definitely deserve a thorough look-in.
By choosing to ignore talents as these and continuously sticking to Jadeja, Dhoni is possibly keeping one chink in his armour when he starts on his quest to bring the coveted World Cup home next year. Considering that a certain 38-year old continues to carry on playing so that his mantelpiece is not devoid of the only trophy that adorns the other great cricketers of this country, the least Dhoni can do is have all the ‘right’ men forming the nucleus of the team. Tendulkar’s last shot definitely deserves a team of specialists and not of generalists.
At that time, Ganguly, Rahul and Sachin were the mainstay and Yuvraj and Sehwag were yet not at their prolific best. Dhoni had not arrived. Which implied that our batting was not quite solid. So we needed a batsman. On the bowling front, Harbhajan was in wilderness, Nehra intermittently injured and inconsistent and Ajit Agarkar at his usual expensive self. There was only Zaheer and Anil to bank on. So we needed a bowler. Hence what better if you get someone who can do a bit of both?
10 years hence with the advent of Irfan, Yusuf, Gautam, Sehwag, Dhoni and the likes you would have thought that we are past that age. Yet, our selectors and our captain continue to befuddle us reposing faith in Ravindra Jadeja. Jadeja, in his current avatar is exactly what we do not need. We can boast of a pretty strong batting line-up now, even though in Sachin's absence, we still appear a bit wobbly and a formidable bowling line-up as well. So why go for a mixed-bag when there are options to choose a specialist bowler or a batsman as the situation demands?
It is also not that Ravindra is a phenomenal performer. Picture this – Ravindra’s batting average is 35.5 which is not enviable by any stretch of imagination and out of that, if one were to look at his performance against the big teams, namely Australia and South Africa his average is a measly 23 and 29 respectively. The strike-rate is good but nothing to wax eloquence about. Hence, he does not merit a place purely on his batting talent.
Having a sneak peek on his bowling performance one is inclined to conclude that as a fifth bowler he is way too good but since when have we started playing with five regular bowlers? And even if we do, why not allow Pragyan Ojha or Amit Mishra to have a shot for a regular place. Both of them have shown sufficient talent to definitely deserve a thorough look-in.
By choosing to ignore talents as these and continuously sticking to Jadeja, Dhoni is possibly keeping one chink in his armour when he starts on his quest to bring the coveted World Cup home next year. Considering that a certain 38-year old continues to carry on playing so that his mantelpiece is not devoid of the only trophy that adorns the other great cricketers of this country, the least Dhoni can do is have all the ‘right’ men forming the nucleus of the team. Tendulkar’s last shot definitely deserves a team of specialists and not of generalists.
Set as favorite
Comments (5)

a guest
said:
|
... Talk of generalists ... the entire article is general in nature .. and average. Any reasons why u choose specialists to bits and pieces players ? Ever given a thought to the change that cricket has undergone since the times you are talking about ? And please dont make it sound that we should win the world cup because it might be sachins swansong.. oh btw .. I hate Ravindra Jadeja too .. |
|
a guest
said:
|
... IWho would u prefer to see walk in when India is 225/6 with 6-7 overs to go: Ojha / Mishra or Jadeja??? If he can show some consistency in batting to add to his bowling then he is the ideal no 7...... Knowing you have Jadeja in at no 7 reduces pressure on the likes of Sehwag & Yuvraj & allows them to bat with more freedom..... Its not just what Jadeja brings to the field in performance but his affect on the rest of the squad as well..... Its a big boost to the opening batman knowing he has 6 guys who can finish a match in case he fails.... In my opinion the only choice for Dhoni is whether the no 7 sllot goes to Jadeja or Pathan (given that the World Cup is being played on Indian batting wkts where steep bounce is unheard of) |
|
Write comment
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|






