From the iSport Cricket Pavilion: Is Messr Vinod Kambli a liar? iSporter Linus Fernandes pens a thought provoking piece that every Cricket lover must read. Where is the end? He questions. Read on to know more.
Sachin Tendulkar’s schoolmate did a Kapil Dev on national television venting his angst at the perceived injustices done him by Indian selectors and pointing the finger of suspicion against his teammates for the 1996 World Cup semifinal debacle. Kambli’s tears were on display when Team India crumbled to an ignominious defeat against the rampaging Sri Lankans of the 90s at Eden Gardens, Kolkata.
The dashing left-hander was the last man standing in a shambles of an innings but hardly gloriously.
To open a Pandora’s box, fifteen years later, calls into question the man’s motives and character. Ajit Wadekar, Sanjay Manjrekar, Saurav Ganguly and Mohammad Azharuddin have, to a man, attacked Kambli for his ‘revelations’.
Mohammad Azharuddin termed the decision to bowl first “a collective decision.” As a side, how do these collective decisions work? Are they put to vote? Are disagreements tabled? Isn’t it true that one or two propose and the rest acquiescently dispose? Wadekar confessed that the Indian team was overconfident and cocky in their approach. But certainly no allegations of match-fixing could be levelled against his boys.
The left-hander quoted Wadekar that Kambli was made the scapegoat for the horrific loss. Kambli can claim that he never had a godfather among the wise men that choose players to represent the national side. The Indian sports minister, Ajay Maken—quick to take his cue—-jumped into the fray asserting that Kambli’s allegations should be investigated. Anything that makes the case for his proposed National Sports Bill is manna for the mantri.
Can Vinod Kambli’s accusations be taken at face value? Or should we believe the flashy Hyderabadi who confessed to match-fixing when pressed by the CBI and was banned for life the BCCI? The ban was rescinded later by the Indian cricket board—not the ICC.Azharuddin’s quest for justice meanders on in the Hyderabad high court.
For most Indian fans, the point is moot. Much like doping in athletics, the spectre of match and spot fixing looms over the sport like a dark shadow dogging its very existence. Corruption should be rooted out. Sport is pure and represents everything that’s good. It’s a microcosm of life without the politics. Fair play triumphs or so we would believe. Most Indian fans, however, recall the 1996 semifinal as a shameful moment in Indian sporting history when crowd violence ended a contest prematurely, tainting forever the sporting integrity of Kolkattans. Can we then blame our sporting heroes for having feet of clay? Aren’t they a mirror of ourselves?
Is this why Indian film stars have more temples devoted to them than any of the country’s sporting icons? Doesn’t escapism shove aside reality?
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something.
—Plato
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/hide comments
Gaurav Shinde
said:
 |
... I do believe that Vinod Kambli is talking now coz he just wants some limelight, but his exclusion after the world cup was a bit too much. He was talented and probably has been called the biggest loss to Indian Cricket who played his last match at 24? thats too early to write someone off. The selectors have been unfair to him. |
Show/hide comment form
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
